![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
Louth Branch Magazine articles
|
This is the Louth Branch website. Always Leeds always loyal ! Edited by Gerry Cunningham. Leeds United's fixtures for season 2011/12 click here Fixture dates will be changed to suit Sky and BBC. We wish our good friend, Jim Keating the very best as he moves along on the road to recovery after a recent operation. I'll be travelling during the next week or so. Updates will be sporadic at best ! Sat 29th of October. Leeds 1-1 Cardiff City – Att. 20,270. 12 Rachubka, 02 Connolly, 22 Lees, 28 White, 48 O'Dea (Kisnorbo 32) 14 Howson15 Clayton YC, 16 Pugh (Sam 78) 23 Snodgrass, 38 Keogh (Becchio 55) 44 McCormack. Unused Subs : 30 Cairns, 07 Vayrynen. Robert Snodgrass struck a second-half equaliser for Leeds after an inspired performance by keeper David Marshall had threatened to deny the hosts. Cardiff took a 17th-minute lead when Joe Mason pounced on Darren O'Dea's hesitancy for an opportunist strike. Leeds completely dominated from then on as Snodgrass, Ross McCormack and Adam Clayton tested Marshall. But the goalkeeper had no chance when Snodgrass poked in from Tom Lees' knock-down 17 minutes from time. Stuck on the sidelines - player gets foot trapped Lees then wasted a glorious chance to snatch victory in the closing stages but he failed to connect properly with a free header from six yards. Cardiff, who have now failed to win in six consecutive away games, could have had few complaints had Lees scored after the visitors offered almost nothing as an attacking force in the second half. The result ends a string of six straight defeats for Leeds against the Bluebirds, but the home side created enough opportunities to feel they deserved better. Cardiff's opener owed much to Mason's perseverance but O'Dea's dithering just inside his own penalty box was the deciding factor. The centre-back won the race to Peter Whittingham's speculative through ball, but he stumbled as he attempted to clear, giving Mason the opportunity to nick the ball. Robert Snodgrass pounced to secure a point for Leeds United Mason, whose fine recent form kept Kenny Miller and Rob Earnshaw on the bench, shifted the ball to his left to avoid Rachubka's lunge and finished left-footed at full stretch for his third goal in as many games. O'Dea could point to a slight nudge from behind as he reached the ball, but it was his own indecision that opened the door for Mason. Leeds responded positively, Weds October 26th 2011. Birmingham 1 - 0 Leeds Team : 12 Rachubka, 02 Connolly, 22 Lees , 28 White , 48 O'Dea, 14 Howson 15 Clayton (Vayrynen 77) 16 Pugh (Sam 73) 23 Snodgrass 38 Keogh (Becchio 63) 44 McCormack Unused Substitutes : 30 Cairns, 03 Kisnorbo. Leeds missed a series of really good chances against Birmingham City, particularly in the first half, and were left to rue tho9se misses. Nikola Zigic scored his first goal since February as Birmingham extended their winning run to six games with a narrow victory over Leeds. Zigic opened his account for the season when full-back Stephen Carr delivered a cross from the right and he controlled the ball before firing past Paul Rachubka. Blues keeper Boaz Myhill made a great save to keep out Adam Clayton's volley. He also tipped over Ross McCormack's effort late on. Scotland international Robert Snodgrass fired wide for Leeds and also drilled a shot over from distance as the hosts hung on for victory. For Birmingham, Zigic and substitute Chris Wood produced good saves from Rachubka, while Chris Burke fired narrowly wide after the restart. Defeat ended fifth-placed Leeds' seven-match unbeaten league record. Victory sees Chris Hughton's Blues move to within a point of the Yorkshire side and they also have two games in hand Weds 26th of April 2011. Leeds United have loaned out Billy Paynter to fellow Championship side, Brighton. Simon Grayson has defended his decision to send Billy Paynter on loan to Brighton, insisting he felt obliged to allow the Leeds United striker to join another Championship club. Grayson revealed that the decision to accept Brighton’s approach was taken on Thursday with no other second-tier sides showing a serious interest in signing Paynter. Click here to register and have your say on the Leeds United stories and issues that matter to you. The 27-year-old was made available earlier this month with his prospects of first-team football at Elland Road limited, and Grayson initially insisted that he would not allow the player to assist any of Leeds’ likely rivals for promotion to the Premier League. The United manager relented, however, with Paynter anxious to remain in the Championship, and Brighton ended a long pursuit of his signature by landing him on a temporary basis until January 2. League One side Preston North End were also interested but found Paynter unwilling to drop into their division. Grayson said: “We’ve had one or two enquiries but Billy wanted to stay in the Championship. He felt he’d worked hard enough to get into it with us. “I did say that we wouldn’t loan him to any of our rivals but Brighton were the only ones who came in and made the deal worthwhile. “We felt okay about it and sometimes you’ve got to be fair to the player. Billy’s been unlucky here and we owed him the right to go and get some games.” Brighton are just two points worse off than Leeds and the sides fought out a lively 3-3 draw on the south coast last month, but Albion’s fixtures before January 2 include meetings with other prominent Championship sides, two against league leaders Southampton. Grayson said: “Brighton are playing against a few teams who are going to be up there so if he scores some goals then it might help our cause. “You can’t always say that every deal is best for all parties and on this occasion I needed to help the player out because he needs some games.” Monday 24th 2011. Leeds are looking to offload Billy Paynter to Prest Sunday October 23rd 2011. Championship Update. After thirteen games Southampton lead Sat October 22nd. Peterboro 2-3 Leeds United 12 Rachubka, 02 Connolly, 22 Lees, 28 White, 48 O'Dea yc, 07 Vayrynen (Sam 48 yc) 14 Howson, 15 Clayton, 16 Pugh, 38 Keogh (Becchio 89) 44 McCormack (Nunez 82) Unused Substitutes : 30 Cairns, 03 Kisnorbo, Att – 12,080. A goal deep into injury-time by Darren O'Dea earned Leeds a win agai Sat October 22nd. Change to academy rules. Shaun Harvey says Leeds United will have to review their Academy operation after the adoption of revolutionary new plans for youth football was approved by the Football League. The new Elite Performance Plan was passed by a margin of 46 votes to 22 at a meeting of the clubs earlier this week. Under the new system, the amount of coaching contact time for players in the country’s top academies will be increased. Payments to clubs for youth development will also increase but the regulations also include the abolition of the transfer tribunal system, to be replaced by a fixed level of compensation – leading to fears that lower-league teams will lose top young talent to bigger clubs on the cheap. Harvey has highlighted the case of Luke Garbutt, who left United to join Everton as a 16-year-old for a tribunal-fixed fee of £600,000 with a further £750,000 possibly paid depending on appearances. Leeds were also granted a 20 per cent sell-on clause. The United chief executive said: “Under the new system, the £600,000 would have been replaced by £134,000. “Our costs and time will have been exactly the same so it’s fair to say that’s why I believe this is a dark day for clubs who actively develop youth players over a period of time. “We are going to have to review how we operate. Our Academy has actually generated some very substantial transfer fees but that’s not our motive for running the Academy. “Our motive is to try and bring players through into our first-team squad. The first-team squad at the moment has probably seven players who have come through our Academy. “I certainly think there will be a dilution of what clubs are doing because if you look at losing players for a reduced amount of compensation that doesn’t cover the cost of running a development scheme then there will be many clubs looking at the situation to see if it’s worthwhile.” Huddersfield Town joined Leeds in voting against the plans, as did United’s opponents today, Peterborough, whose director Barry Fry voiced concerns that many lower league clubs may opt to shut down their youth systems. League chairman Greg Clarke, however, said: “We hope Football League clubs continue to develop, retain and fill their first teams with top local talent. “There is always a danger under the new scheme that larger clubs will be a bit more predatory. We hope we don’t see that.” Tues October 18th 2011 - Leeds 1-1 Coventry City Leeds : Rachubka, Connolly, Lees, O`Dea, White, Howson, Clayton, Pugh, Snodgrass (Vayrynen 79), McCormack (Becchio 70), Keogh (Forssell 70) Simon Grayson was forced into one change to the side for the game with Tues October 18th.Barn door Billy set for the exit door. Leeds striker Billy Paynter is set to leave the club on loan and a host of Championship clubs are looking to sign him, skysports.com understands. The 27-year-old moved to Elland Road last summer from Swindon, but is now out of favour under Simon Grayson. Now a host of clubs are ready to try and battle for his signature on loan. Skysports.com understands that up to half-a-dozen clubs are interested in landing him with Coventry C, Barnsley, Derby, Doncaster, Blackpool, and Brighton all believed to be keen on landing Paynter. Pigs do indeed fly. Tues Oct 18th 2011. Ormsby’s Not Bitter - (former Leeds Utd captain) by Shane Murphy Waterford United FC (first published in the March 2011 Finn Harps match programme)“We only drink Hoffmans and bottles of rum, the Waterford boys are in town!” So goes one of the long-standing songs of the Blues faithful, but if you ever happen upon The Spa Complex bar in Scarborough, you might want to sample the local brew, Ormsby’s Bitter, named after the former Leeds United captain, European Cup winner and Waterford United manager Brendan Ormsby. The mid ’90s was an unsuccessful period for Waterford United – languishing in the First Division for five seasons (finishing as low as 8th) and changing manager once a year until Tommy Lynch lead us back into the top flight. The first of those seasons actually held some promise as we moved into our new stadium and appointed a player-manager with vast experience in England. Ormsby, who turned 50 last October, came to Waterford with great pedigree. He captained the England Youth team and came through the Aston Villa youth system with Gary Shaw and Gordon Cowans, making his senior debut in 1978. His greatest moment came in 1982 when he gained a European Cup winners medal as part of the Villa squad that beat Bayern Munich in the final (having started three of Villa’s nine matches in the competition). A centre half, he only scored 4 goals in 8 years at Aston Villa, but is fondly remembered for one in particular in 1985. No TV cameras were present so we have to trust the memory of the fans at Upton Park when Brendan hit a 45 yard rocket to the net that some described as the greatest goal they’d ever seen. It was from such an unlikely source that it was met with stunned silence before Villa right back Gary Williams burst out laughing! In 1986, Brendan moved to Leeds United where he became captain. In his first season, he scored the goal that put Billy Bremner’s Second Division side through to the FA Cup quarter finals. However, a bad mistake from the centre back helped Coventry to win the semi 3-2 and cost Leeds a place in the final. He played with Strachan, Speed and Vinnie Jones when Howard Wilkinson managed Leeds to promotion in 1990, but left that summer for Doncaster Rovers. After two seasons there and a short spell with Scarborough, his next move was into management when the Blues came calling. Waterford’s tenancy in Kilcohan Park had come to a heart-breaking end in 1993 with a relegation play-off defeat to Monaghan. Alfie Hale stepped down as manager and was replaced by 32-year-old Ormsby. Having become the epitome of a yo-yo club with 3 relegations and 2 promotions in the previous five years, United were expecting to bounce straight back up in our first season at the RSC, but when we drew our first five matches the signs were clear that the yo-yo’s string was about to be cut. In total, we drew 13 of our 27 matches which was both critical and ironic given this was the first season when three points were awarded for a win. In fact, we only claimed maximum points six times – the highpoint being a 6-0 hammering of tonight’s visitors, equalling Finn Harps’ record defeat. Paul Stokes finished top scorer with 7 of our 32 goals as the Blues came 7th in the ten team First Division. A tame 1-0 home Cup defeat to Cobh on a wet, miserable Thursday afternoon just about summed up the season. When the League finished in April, the club wanted a change and, despite being regarded as a popular character here, Brendan left by mutual consent. Later that year, in a Leeds United matchday programme, he gave his views on his time with the Blues. “Let’s say it was a learning experience. It was quite amateurish in some ways. The facilities were bad. We were expected to train on car parks. Then in one game, I had to take the goalkeeper (Paul Flynn) off just after half-time because he was a big star for Waterford at hurling. The sport is really big over there. Waterford had a hurling semi-final that same day and that took preference. After coming out of our game he was given a fast car police escort to the hurling tie!” Despite his clash with the GAA, Brendan said he really enjoyed his time in Waterford and would’ve liked another year. After Waterford, he played a few games with Wigan before becoming a postman. “I start work at 4.30 am which is about the time I used to get in from a night out when I was a footballer”. He writes a weekly column about Leeds United in the Yorkshire Evening Post, and two weeks ago went back into management after a gap of 17 years. He is now in charge of the mighty Pontefract Colleries FC of the North Eastern Counties League Division One (the tenth level of the English football pyramid – five levels below the Conference). And whenever he feels like it, he can have a pint of Ormsby’s Bitter – official beer of the Scarborough branch of the Leeds United supporters club. Maybe he’ll raise a glass next November to toast Waterford’s First Division title success!
Saturday October 15th. As the Championship begins to take s Friday October 14th. Doncaster Rovers 0-3 Leeds United. Team : 01 Lonergan, (Rachubka 77mins) 02 Connolly, 22 Lees, 28 White, 48 O'Dea, 14 Howson, 15 Clayton, 16 (Vayrnen 85mins) Pugh, 23 Snodgrass 38 Keogh 44 McCormack (becchio 72mins) Unused Subs : 12 Rachubka, 26 Bromby. Unsused Suns : Kisnorbo and Forrsell. Att - 12,692 (4,209 Leeds) All week Chairman John Ryan was talking up Doncaster's Sat 15th of October 2011. Who Owns Leeds United ? An Inside Out Special – by David Conn Guardian reporter and football journalist - When the House of Friday October 14th 2011. YEP - Phil Hay - Are fans falling out of love with Leeds United ? Monday night’s TV documentary on the ownership of Leeds United was followed by a fans forum on Tuesday, staged by BBC Radio Leeds at the West Yorkshire Playhouse. I was part of a three-man panel alongside David Conn, the Guardian journalist who presented Inside Out, and Rob Wilson, a sports management lecturer from Sheffield Hallam University. Around 30 fans attended an hour-long debate about Leeds United past, present and future. The BBC advertised the forum as a reaction to a documentary which, while providing a clear overview of United’s ownership structure under chairman Ken Bates, presented little in the way of new facts to those who have followed the story with forensic interest. Tuesday’s discussion ranged from Leeds’ insolvency in 2007 to Bates’ purchase of a majority shareholding in April of this year and examined the commitment of the Football League, the Premier League and the Football Association in seeking transparency from English clubs. Leeds United’s view is that demands for transparency at Elland Road were met by Bates’ acquisition of a 72.85 per cent stake from their previous owners, the Forward Sports Fund (FSF). The deal has been approved by all three of England’s governing bodies, the FA included, and the fight for detailed disclosure about FSF might well be at an end. The FA was urged to examine United’s ownership structure by a parliamentary select committee but there is no sign of an investigation in waiting and Wednesday’s Government response made no direct reference to it. Talk about the lack of clarity between 2005 and early 2011 was prevalent on Tuesday but, by the end of the forum, United’s system of ownership in that period had become a side issue. The overriding theme was one of frustration among of collection of supporters who are disillusioned and disenchanted with their club; not yet disassociated, since all of those who spoke were regulars at Elland Road, but lacking the sense that they are valued or respected by the board at Elland Road. An air of apathy, if apathy is the right word, has been obvious in Leeds for months – an atmosphere which, in my opinion, feels at its lowest ebb since the 2006-07 season. That is something of an irony when promotion in 2010 was followed by a seventh-placed finish in the Championship last season, but there was no sparkle or joy in the fans who attended Tuesday’s gathering. One outlined his loss of faith by explaining how he takes a flask of coffee to Elland Road, simply to ensure he pays the club no money over and above the cost of his ticket. The recent close season was dominated by complaints about United’s transfer strategy but it seemed clear on Tuesday that investment in the squad is only part of the issue. It was discussed at the forum, as it had to be, but not at great length. Time and again the debate returned to supporters claiming that their views are not heard or welcome at Elland Road; describing themselves as undervalued or alienated – some the subject of direct criticism from Bates. They gave the impression that their relationship with Leeds is at a seriously low ebb, at a time when average crowds at Elland Road are down by 4,000 on last season. It should be said at this point that a forum about the ownership of Leeds United was most likely to attract critics of Bates and his board. It is also true to say that the views of 30 people are not automatically representative of Leeds’ support as a whole. But they are representative of some of them and it is logical to assume that those at Tuesday’s debate share pubs, clubs and rows in the stands with like-minded people. However widespread this feeling is, it cannot be in Leeds’ interests to have a disconnected element at the core of their support. Rob Wilson spoke in favour of United’s financial strategy and was most qualified to do so, describing the club as a solid business model, but he made the point that the strength of any business depends on reliable and satisfied custom. In other words, a football club should not risk losing fans over grievances which are reasonable or honestly held. One of the recommendations in Wednesday’s Government report on football was that English clubs engage in and maintain communication with independent fans groups. The report said: “The Government believes that every club should have a dedicated and mandatory supporter liaison officer. Furthermore, that every club should officially recognise the relevant supporters groups or trusts and keep an open dialogue with them.” In Leeds, you have the Leeds United Supporters Club. You also have the Leeds United Supporters Trust, an organisation which is growing and whose profile has been enhanced by the appointment of Nigel Martyn as its president. There are avenues for dialogue and opportunities for an exchange of views so long as the will to talk constructively exists on both sides. If Tuesday’s forum was at all reflective of the wider mood, the process of re-engagement cannot begin quickly enough. October 13th 2011. Taken from website 200% . Who owns Leeds United ? Many years ago, I listened to prize-winning author and ultra-famous Arsenal fan Nick Hornby reading extracts from the book which made his name, Fever Pitch. And the reading was a disappointment. Hornby was good, but just not as funny as the voice, indeterminate and certainly not my own, in which I’d read the original. The same disappointment arose when listening to speeches by Guardian journalist David Conn. Conn is a decent speaker – even when “10-minute” speeches to Supporters Direct conferences exceed half-an-hour, but his words spoke louder from the page in the voice inside my head. This I know to be unfair, after watching the long-heralded documentary Who Owns Leeds United, which aired on October 10th in the BBC’s Yorkshire and Lincolnshire area. For the core material of the programme overpowered concerns about presentation, and the presentation itself was of a standard to which all football documentaries should aspire. The twenty-nine minutes on Leeds’ recent ownership history focused its attention, for reasons lawyers may be best-placed to describe, on the club’s current owner, Kenneth William Bates. Conn told the story of their ownership, since the departure of former chairman Mr Peter Ridsdale esq, with a refreshing clarity. And while the story contained nothing new to close observers of Leeds since 2004 – which would include many readers of this site – it would have provided valuable insight to those new to it. Conn took us methodically and simply, though never simplistically, through Leeds’ tale of financial woe, beginning with Ridsdale “living the dream” at the start of the century. “It is generally accepted that the Peter Ridsdale was financially disastrous for the club,” Conn noted. This isn’t, of course, accepted by Ridsdale himself in his current energetic efforts to re-write this part of Leeds United’s history. But this was a documentary didn’t get side-tracked on such side-issues – unlike me. The tribulations of the “Yorkshire Consortium” of local businessman who in 2004 tried, and failed, to repair the financial damage done by Ridsdale, were faithfully recalled by then-chairman Gerald Krasner. Eyebrows may have been raised when insolvency practitioner Krasner stated that the consortium “were not rich men,” having claimed his Leeds chairmanship to be a “labour of love” for which he would normally have charged “a lot of money,” – many BBC Iplayer viewers in the Plymouth area would know roughly how much per hour he may have meant by that. But the documentary was honest enough about the consortium’s failings, even in its rush to get to the star of its show, Bates, the “unlikely guardian angel from the tax haven of Monaco.” The documentary was at its most revealing and disturbing at this point, with two stark, black-and-white photos of a younger Bates. The second was demonstrably Bates, though with dark hair. The first showed a clean-shaven, portly yet kindly-looking face, peering innocently out of a car window; proof that the camera may not perpetually tell the truth. Bates’ “colourful” business history was given a brief, wilfully disrespectful airing – “wheeling and dealing… he dabbled in ready-mixed concrete”, as dodgy-sounding a business CV as you could write, bang-updated by the addition of 21st-century business bêtes-noires, “property and banking.” Author Tom Bower, who devoted thirty-three pages of his book Broken Dreams – Vanity, Greed And The Souring Of British Football to Bates, gave us his précis of Bates’ 23 years at Chelsea, buying the club from bankruptcy and selling it just before it became bankrupt again. “Not a great achievement,” he noted. In a warning to fans currently protesting against Bates for developing Leeds’ Elland Road ground rather than the team, Bower said Bates, while Chelsea chairman, “redeveloped the ground and earned a lot of money for himself from it.” And he added that he didn’t think “selling (Chelsea) to a Russian oligarch was a great service to the fans,” which is not a view held by everyone with Chelsea allegiances – not yet, anyway. But the idea of Bates as self-serving twister was established. And Conn warmed to that theme immediately. Newspapers heralding the “Bates Era” at Leeds in January 2005 “suggested Bates had personally taken over Leeds. But Bates denied being anything more than the “UK representative” of an indeterminate entity called ‘Forward Sports Fund’ (FSF), which had actually ‘bought’ Leeds. With heavy emphasis on the words “overseas” and “tax haven,” Conn showed how difficult it was to demonstrate whether Bates was lying… or even telling the truth, for that matter. Economist John Christensen cited a purely hypothetical example of “someone who’s resident off-shore, say in Monaco.” Tax havens weren’t just havens from tax: “Professionally we call them ‘secrecy jurisdictions,’” he told us, adding emotively that “money-laundering and bad activities” could be going on “because we can’t find out who actually owns the club.” The secrecy of Leeds’ ownership, it was implied, also cost the club a £25m loan from Leeds City Council, and seconds of airtime later Conn added that “just two-and-a-half years after Ken Bates took over Leeds, the club was effectively bust.” At which point the documentary played the “small business” card. Conn interviewed Stuart Russell, whose ‘small’ firm Russell’s Patisserie, was owed £2,700 by Leeds. Not “a lot of money in the big scheme of things,” Russell himself noted, “but you have to make a lot of rolls to make £2,500.” So, a third of the way into the documentary, Bates was already established as a secretive failure who took Leeds into administration. This was the cue for a topical dig at the ‘Football Creditor’s Rule’ which ensures that usually highly-paid players get all their money out of an administration process, while Stuart Russell “got back a cheque for just under £50.” “Incidentally”, said Krasner, pretending the thought had just come to him, “a football manager is not a football creditor.” So Bates’ first Leeds manager, Kevin Blackwell, was left to scrabble for a small fraction of the, ulp, £993,332 he was owed. But two organisations stood to lose much more, “obscure off-shore companies called Astor Investment Holdings and Krato,” which had apparently loaned Bates’s Leeds £15m. Astor and Krato were quickly linked to “tax havens” and “closely-guarded” secrecy, just before Krasner explained that they insisted “that the person who has lost them that money be allowed to buy back the club,” as they told administrators, KPMG, that they would waive their bumper debts if, and only if, Bates remained “in charge” at Leeds, on behalf of… well, no-one, exactly, seemed to know. “Just to repeat,” added Conn, directly addressing the many viewers who had just shouted “Eh?” at their screens, “the investors who lost a staggering £18m under Ken Bates still insisted that he remain in charge.” The viewer was then taken on a European tour of companies and court cases to determine why Astor and Krato were so keen to get Bates back in charge. But even high court judges couldn’t find out ‘who’ let alone ‘why.’ Bates, of course, was “the most obvious person… to clear up the mystery.” The documentary had already shown him saying that “the one condition they made of coming in was that they did not want any publicity or their identities being disclosed.” But this was immediately followed by an “incredulous” Krasner saying Bates “didn’t even know who he was working for,” inviting the viewer to ask how, then, did Bates know what they were thinking? As the documentary-makers strongly suspected, Bates wasn’t about to answer their questions, claiming in an e-mail worthy of a school exercise book belonging to “Ken Bates, Class 2D, aged seven,” that he found the BBC (the “Bloated, Biased Corporation”) “thoroughly untrustworthy.” Further examples of Bates’ literary skills were cited; his reference to Leeds fans as “morons” (comfortably refuted by fan representatives’ concise, well-informed contributions to the programme) and his likening, in the official club programme column, of Leeds United to sex, in a passage which would have had any children reading the programme asking “what does that mean, Daddy?” Daddy, of course, wouldn’t have known, as what Bates wrote was, in fact, nonsense. But, as Lee Hicken of the Leeds United Supporters Trust pointed out: “there’s usually something in there that will offend someone.” Conn then turned to the football authorities’ regulations “designed to make sure that the people who own clubs are upstanding,” having just established that Bates was pretty far from “upstanding.” We were the taken on another tour of ignorance, as it was revealed that the Football League and the Football Association had declared Leeds’ owners to be “fit and proper” without ever knowing who they were. Nobody from the League, “including its chairman Greg Clarke, was prepared to talk to us on camera,” Conn added, implying that not even Clarke could defend their (in)action in public debate. The League instead provided a statement which said little more than that Leeds’ owners were fit and proper because the club said so, to which the most reasonable retort can only be, “Right, so who are they, then?”. And they couldn’t say what the club said because it was confidential. They, and Bates, would like to file such matters under ‘history’ now that Bates has bought the majority, controlling shareholding in Leeds – via “an obscure company based in (a) tax haven”, Conn added, probably unnecessarily by this stage. But even this apparent clarification raised more questions, as “just at the point when the riches of the Premier League were out of the club’s grasp,” – i.e. just as the club’s market value plummeted – it was put up for sale by FSF. This was yet more anti-logic for newcomers to the story to ponder, before being told Bates was the buyer, having been about the only person who seemed to know the club was for sale. Viewers were left to draw many of their own conclusions, not least on how Bates could redevelop Elland Road without apparent reference to its owners – a “company based in (a) tax haven,” as Conn noted “while we’re at it.” But the documentary transcript was much longer than other recent football documentaries of comparable length. It never felt too rushed to understand. And the right interviewees made the right points at the right times. And whilst the title’s eponymous question was never going to be answered – unless an anonymous source dropped the answers through David Conn’s letterbox in a brown envelope – it never felt like the piece of failed investigative journalism it technically was. Of course, seasoned observers already suspect who has beneficially controlled Leeds United since 2005, whether they have (exacted) that control directly or through, shall we say, ‘related’ individuals. But the point now is to force the football authorities to guard against a repeat – in that sense, the documentary was well-timed, coming hours before the government’s response to the parliamentary select committee’s report on ‘football governance.’ It is small wonder, on the basis of stories such as this, that even a government naturally inclined towards a laissez-faire attitude towards governance in so many areas of life is taking such a hard line on football at the moment. October 12th 2011. Leeds United have rewarded Zac Thompson for his impressive start to his career with the club with a new contract. The 18-year-old joined Leeds' scholarship scheme from Everton in January and has been handed a new contract until 2013. He made his senior debut against Middlesbrough in August and his first start the week after. Manager Simon Grayson told the club website: "Zac has made an impression since he's been here." He continued: "He had a good pre-season, he got himself involved in merit, and not only did he play a part, he impressed in what he did and how he went about things. If I believe young players deserve an opportunity I will give them one."Unfortunately, we lost him with an ankle injury at a time when he was in and around things, but hopefully he shouldn't be too far away from stepping things up again." Thompson is one of three youngsters to have impressed for Leeds this season, with Charlie Taylor and Tom Lees both appearing in the first team. "We like what we've seen with a number of the younger players," Grayson added. "They've grasped their opportunities and they've done well. Young players are always the future of your club and we're pleased to have some youngsters here who are ready to step up and take their chances."If I believe young players deserve an opportunity I will give them one." October 8th. 25-year-old Honduran, Ramon Nunez agreed terms on a deal which will keep him at Elland Road until at least 2015 after a string of impressive performances in recent weeks. And Grayson believes the Honduran international can continue to make an impact. "He is an important member of the squad and we believe he will keep progressing," he told the club's official website. "We know his favoured position is behind the striker and we haven't been playing that way over the past couple of weeks. "He is versatile though and has had an impact on games he has been involved in. "There's a number of players working very, very hard who haven't been in the team or on the bench and Ramon is one of those. He's probably been the most unfortunate one in that he wasn't involved in our last two games, but we like what we see and we know what he can do." Sat October 1st 2011. From YEP – Leeds 1-0 Portsmouth. Team : 01 Lonergan, 02 Connolly, 22 Lees, 28 White, 48 O'Dea, 14 Howson, 15 Clayton, 16 Pugh, 23 Snodgrass (Vayrynen 77) 38 Keogh (Becchio 68) 44 McCormack (Forssell 78) Unused Subs : 12 Rachubka, 26 Bromby, Ref : Miller. Att- 22,476. Danny Pugh marked his second home Sat Oct 1st 2011. Leeds extends stay but other contracts winding down. Leeds United Sat Oct 1st 2011. Grayson on transfers. Simon Grayson has admitted that out-going transfers from Elland Road will be necessary before any new players come to Leeds United Oct 1st. Shaun Harvey on the Strategy at Leeds. YEP- Hay. In his final exclusive interview, Leeds United chief executive Shaun Harvey told Phil Hay that good housekeeping would underpin a return to the Barclays Premier League. On the day when Ken Bates first became Leeds United chairman, the club held 14th position in the Championship. More than six years later and with near-perfect symmetry, Leeds lie 13th in the same division; a comparison which lends itself nicely to the subject of progress at Elland Road. In plain footballing terms, Leeds are as they were midway through 2005: a second-tier team with the stated aim of winning promotion to the Premier League. It is as a business where the differences are most pronounced and most supportive of the Bates era, creating what his chief executive, Shaun Harvey, calls a “great record”.. Leeds are no longer the money-losing entity they were for much of the past decade. The financial results make impressive reading and buck the trend of English football but it is going some to describe United’s progress as a football team as extraordinary. Relegation from the Championship was followed by three seasons in League One, the first time Leeds had competed at such a low level of the Football League. Automatic promotion drew a necessary line in the sand, and a seventh-placed finish in the Championship last season was creditable if, ultimately, disappointing. In the city, there is a tangible sense of impatience about an exile from the Premier League which is now into its eighth year, and United are not oblivious to accusations that they, as a club, prioritise the health of their business over the strength of their team. It is a claim which Harvey strenuously denies. “We’ve got two clear objectives,” he said. “One is to get the club playing at the highest level – ie the Premier League – as quickly as practically possible. The other is to make sure our success is supported by a business which is healthy, profitable and doesn’t rely on third-party support. “If you take a step back, I’d suggest that our objectives are exactly the same as the objectives of our fans. Most of them would want a successful team and a club who are financially secure in the long term. The only difference between the board and the fans is over how we should achieve those aims. “We maintain a realistic budget and I’ve no doubt that our strategy will work. I’m not saying it might work; I’m saying that it will. We’re properly run, we operate at a profit and ultimately big clubs will always be big clubs. We might not get into the Premier League overnight but it’s going to happen and, when it does, we’ll go into the Premier League as a sustainable club.” The mention of third-party support raises the topic of major external investment, of which Leeds – to the naked eye – have seen little since 2007. Substantial investment is widely seen as a path to a stronger playing squad, though Harvey said Leeds would continue to work towards a profit regardless of any injection of funds. Bates has spoken many times of potential investors on the horizon and Harvey admitted that, in the aftermath of United’s insolvency, talks have taken place with a number of interested parties without success. He is still of the opinion that external investment is not pivotal to the strategy of United’s board, but rather a means of quickening the club’s progress. “We already have a plan to achieve our aims and a plan which we know will work,” Harvey said. “Investment would simply help us achieve them. Without investment it might take longer. “As a board we’ve always said that we’d welcome investment, and that remains the case today, but it has to be right for us and right for the club. We’ve had any number of people approach us, some credible and some less so, and nothing’s come to fruition as yet. No-one has come up with a proposal which felt acceptable to us, but I remain confident that investment will be found.” When it comes to investment, many supporters wonder why it proves so elusive. Are rich individuals reluctant to deal with Leeds? Harvey’s view is that many potential investors, particularly those who live in the city, are scared off by the implication of having a say in the club’s operations. The board at Elland Road witnessed protests against them before Leeds’ 1-0 defeat to Middlesbrough on August 13, and criticism of Bates has been audible among sections of United’s support. “Part of the reason why people come forward and express an interest in investing is because one of Leeds United’s biggest assets is our fans,” Harvey said. “But there are also times when the fans don’t help. When people see protests and unrest it makes them think twice about getting involved.” I make the point that the first organised protest took place less than two months ago, against a board who have been in place for several years. “I’m talking about general disharmony,” Harvey said. “Whenever there’s disquiet or a feeling of unease, it’s very difficult to persuade people to come on board. “I know of local businessmen who wanted to get involved but didn’t want the aggravation or the attention they’d get. Somebody once said to me ‘I’d like to invest but my kids go to school in Leeds.’ It can put people off. “We don’t get everything right as a club, but the staff here genuinely care and they’re some of the best in the country. I want people to realise that what we’re doing is in the best interests of Leeds United and trust us to make it pay off in the long term. We believe in our strategy.” Part of the disquiet Harvey talks of was caused by a lack of clarity over United’s ownership structure. Many months of questions over who precisely owned Leeds – a matter which attracted the attention of the Houses of Parliament – led to a sudden development in April when Bates acquired a 72.85 per cent shareholding in Leeds City Holdings Limited, the firm which owns Leeds United Football Club Limited. Previously, the majority stake in Leeds was held by The Forward Sports Fund (FSF), an offshore company registered in Nevis. The identity of FSF’s beneficiaries was never revealed and the announcement of Bates’ buy-out came with limited details. His payment to FSF was described as an “undisclosed sum”. The issue will be examined again in a forthcoming BBC documentary, due to be screened next month. “For a club in the Championship, we get an excessive amount of media coverage,” Harvey said. “The club are now owned by Ken Bates and that’s been approved by all the relevant footballing authorities. From our point of view, they’re the only people we need to satisfy. Harvey, meanwhile, is happy to accept that present-day Leeds United are a reflection of the current board. The name of Peter Ridsdale, the former Leeds chairman blamed for the club’s spectacular collapse, continues to be mentioned in unfavourable dispatches but Harvey increasingly sees Ridsdale as an irrelevance; a legacy with which Leeds are no longer seriously burdened. “The only legacy of the Ridsdale era is that we’re no longer a Premier League club,” he said. “To some extent you could say that the fact we don’t own Elland Road or Thorp Arch and are required to rent both properties is down to what happened while he was chairman, but a different board sold them. Ridsdale isn’t relevant to what’s going on here now. “We’re following our own plan and the aims we have are clear. “A main part of our objective is to get into the Premier League. Achieving that is down to us and our strategy.” There is, I suggest, a possibility that the strategy won’t work. “It will work,” Harvey said. “Clubs who make best value of their financial resources are always going to do well over time. “In the four years since administration, we’ve posted a profit every single year and we’ve claimed a higher final league position season-on-season. “That’s a pretty good record and it doesn’t suggest that we’re going in the wrong direction.” Index Nov 14th 08 to Dec 31st 08 For Archived Files for December 07 click here For Archived Files from October to November 07 click here For Archived Files from August to September 07 click here For previous news stories, please click here. For what you think of Leeds, click here to send in your rants and I'll include them in the "Rants" page. |
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
|